I spent a terrific day yesterday at the
Kieve-Wavus Educator's Conference on Damariscotta Lake (ME) with some bright, thoughtful, and committed people. A sunny day in a gorgeous setting that fed our bodies and souls, with folks who have some of the same interests I have in progressive education.
Conference participants are spending several days devoted to "better understanding the culture, experience, design, and practice of student-driven education."
As you have already inferred, we were not there to talk about aligning the Common Core State Standards to curricula already written. Instead, we spent much time studying curriculum integration, experiential education, project-based and problem-based learning, and many other forms of curriculum design that start with the needs and interests of students...not teachers.
Unfortunately, I wasn't able to participate on day two so like any (former) professor I'm using this blog to do two things—get in another two cents worth on this exciting approach to learning AND also give my EDC 533 students (graduate class in curriculum) another take on curriculum design possibilities.
Here are three issues that are critical to this kind of work:
1. Part of the problem with talking about this type of learning is that there are so many different terms (see paragraph three above). We also talk about democratic classrooms, negotiated curriculum, hands-on learning, expeditionary learning, and on and on and on. When asked, many teachers indicate that they do this kind of work—here are still more terms— interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, crossdisciplinary, integrated, or integrative. The important point is that while some casual and infrequent stabs at interdisciplinary connections might be considered a good start on the way to a fuller student-driven experience, too often the interdisciplinary unit on turtles or chocolate BECOMES the curriculum event for the term or year. We need to aim higher for truly authentic, integrative experiences where students are involved in studying real problems, connecting with experts around the globe, and making connections across disciplines.
2. Curriculum integration involves significant student involvement (as we did yesterday with the focusing questions). Themes eventually arise out of these world and self questions that become the focus for the entire class, with significant opportunities, of course, for individual study and reflection. In addition to student involvement in setting the questions, the traditional disciplines are critical. Because of the pervasiveness of the separate subject approach (do we learn in any other aspect of our lives by studying only isolated bits and pieces as we do in schools?) a common critique of curriculum integration is that the disciplines are devalued. Not true. Knowledge plays a key role in any integrative study, albeit in a very different form. In fact, the depth and breadth of study in various disciplines is most often greater than the study of school "subjects".
3. Hmmm...the technology piece. Interesting discussion about this yesterday. Ok, here's the thing. I love technology for what it can do for me. Access to the Interwebs (as Thomas says!) allows me to rig my sailboat every year, fix my refrigerator's icemaker, and it will soon teach me to learn to play the Djembe (I hope). Honestly, I don't see how we can learn in 2013 without every student having the tools of learning and to me that includes a device with Internet access. And this is definitely not about teaching kids to learn to use spreadsheets and MS WORD. It is most definitely about access to information and as we learned yesterday afternoon, knowing how to collect and use data. All of this has to be balanced with learning about the natural world and for heaven's sake knowing when to leave the devices home and turned off!
This final comment falls into the structures of schools that promote or inhibit learning. If I were still teaching middle or high school, our classroom would contain some standing desks, several exercise bikes, a treadmill or two, several banks of carrels, and some comfortable seating as well. And I would have large blocks of uninterrupted time for learning, in room working lunches, breaks when we need them...And yes, I am very serious about this.
My new Kieve-Wavus friends...please feel free to comment here with any EDC 533 students as well.